Archives
Categories:
- Business announcements
- Best First Line Contest
- Books/Reading
- Contests
- Editing
- New Releases/Excerpts
- FAQs
- Life
- Miscellaneous
- Round Robin
- TV/Movies
- Writing
Recent Comments
- Ish (Declare Your Independence)
- Meg Benjamin (Declare Your Independence)
- sami lee (Declare Your Independence)
- Shelley Munro (Sensory Input and Stress)
- Catherine (Catherine Berlin's ROMANCING THE STONES, now available in paperback!)
- Brenda Seward (Catherine Berlin's ROMANCING THE STONES, now available in paperback!)
- Moira Reid (Putting the fun back into writing)
- N.J. Walters (Sensory Input and Stress)
- Imogen Howson (Frequently Asked Questions Series: Supplementary Questions)
- Magess (Frequently Asked Questions Series: Supplementary Questions)
Pornography!
por·nog·ra·phy n. 1. Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal.

We’re in the middle of 2007’s Banned Books Week and thought I’d share just one of the many reasons used by complainants to have a book taken out of circulation, both school and public libraries, and it is pornography.
Even though it’s common sense, let me be perfectly clear on at least one thing: it is entirely up to parents, not strangers, to decide what words and images their children are exposed to and when. The American Library Association [ALA] has a policy that basically states:
“Librarians and governing bodies should maintain that parents—and only parents—have the right and the responsibility to restrict the access of their children—and only their children—to library resources.” [ALA – www.ala.org]
I think we can also agree not every parent agrees on the when their child should be exposed to various subject matters or images. With this understanding firmly settled in my mind, I was still shocked at this challenge:
Andersen, Hans Christian. The Little Mermaid. Harcourt. An edition with illustrations of bare-breasted mermaids was challenged in the Bedford, Tex. School District [1994] because it was “pornographic” and contained “satanic pictures.”
In all my years I never, ever, considered this story or the many different illustrations to go with it, in these terms. Parents already have plenty on their plate when it comes to raising their kids, but this is the fun one – be hands-on in their reading now, and you’ll have a reader for life! That said, let’s leave the school library and move into the public one. Here, parents still need to be involved in their child’s selections. The problem is these next examples of someone’s personal definition of pornography aren’t for children!
Friday, Nancy. Women on Top: How Real Life Has Changed Women’s Fantasies. Pocket Bks. Removed from the Chestatee Regional Library System in Gainesville, Ga. [1994] because the book on women’s sexual fantasies is “pornographic and obscene” and lacks “literary merit”. After months of protest and maneuvering, the library’s only copy was destroyed when the child of a patron accidentally dropped it into a dishpan of water. The book is out of print and the library does not plan to replace it.
As a woman and author of erotic romances, I found this challenge particularly offensive. Sexual fantasies, be it a woman’s or a man’s, are healthy and should be embraced, not denigrated with ignorance.
Sharpe, Jon. Trailsman Series. NAL; Penguin. Challenged, but retained at the Springdale, Ark. Public Library [2001] along with other “western” novels because the writing include “pornographic, sexual encounters.”
Okay, confession time, I laughed when I read this challenge. Obviously someone has an issue with cowboys and sex.
Silverstein, Charles, and Edmund White. The Joy of Gay Sex. Crown; Simon & Schuster/Fireside. Challenged, but retained at the Nampa, Idaho Public Library [2006] along with seven other books, including The Joy of Sex despite the complaint that, “they are very pornographic in nature and they have very explicit and detailed illustrations and photographs which we feel doesn’t belong in a library.”
This was interesting because the challenge included a similar book for heterosexuals so it can’t be viewed as being entirely anti-gay. As these books are often viewed as instructional, I think details are a necessity. And, one last thing, the one place this book does belong is in a library!
It seems as if one person’s pornography is another one’s choice.
Banned Books Week is all about celebrating the First Amendment [I was on the Samhain Café earlier today talking about this if you fancy taking a look]. No one should have their opinions silenced or stifled, what we need to do is respect the right for everyone to have their own views.
These examples, and many others, were pulled from Robert P. Doyle’s Banned Books. If you want more Banned Books Week information, visit Tilly Greene’s Hot Thoughts Blog.
Tilly Greene
WARNING! Red hot romances ahead!
www.tillygreene.com
New Beginnings: Carpe Diem, available now at Samhain Publishing
Zandia, available now at Samhain Publishing

When I approached my local library with a request to carry my first in print novel, I was extremely nervous. It was erotic romance! I honestly didn’t believe it would pass muster and end up on the shelves. The head librarian left a message on my answering machine a couple of days later to say, sure they’d buy the book!
Buy! I would’ve been happy if they’d merely accepted the book into the hallowed library shelves. I was very proud of our local librarian for overlooking the racier aspects of the book and concentrating on the story. Not all small town people have small town minds.
It really does all depend on who’s on the library board, on a head librarian—or perhaps on some parent or patron complaining and raising a fuss.
Congrats Bonnie! You are so right – it does depend on the library and staff. Talking it out and finding a solution that doesn’t include banning is always the best way. I found one library that had it recommended they add to the subject to give more views than take them away – sounds pretty good to me :-)
Interesting blog. The following may add another point of view (like the President Eisenhower quote) to the debate: http://web.mac.com/safelibraries/BBW/
Banned Books Week Fraud
President Eisenhower said, “Don’t join the book burners. don’t think you are going to conceal faults by concealing evidence that they ever existed. Don’t be afraid to go in your library and read every book. As long as that document does not offend our own ideas of decency. That should be the only censorship.” Isn’t that better than “anything goes” as promoted by the ALA on “Banned Books Week”?
Very interesting point Dan – except ALA/Banned Books Week celebrates differing opinions. I guess you could define that as “anything goes”, where I see it as all points of view are welcome. In my eyes, they are all about protecting the First Amendment and support people who lodge a challenge, things can be learned from some of them. What they do promote is not to pull the books and deny others who may not see it the same way as the challenger.
I like the challenge that happened in a Florida school. A book about Cuba was challenged by a group who didn’t think it offered a true representation of life on the island. After it was determined by third party to portray a particular view, it was recommended to retain the book and add to the collection so all ideas were there. Sounds like a great solution to me – personal conclusions can be made when ALL the facts are there, not just one or two.
Banning doesn’t solve anything.